Photo of Mia Marko

Mia focuses her practice on business litigation matters. She represents clients in complex litigation in a variety of areas, including commercial litigation, contract disputes, legal malpractice, and higher education litigation. In her higher education practice, Mia provides litigation, counseling, and investigative services to colleges, universities, and other educational institutions. She also assists and advises educational institutions on matters relating to the compensation for use of student athletes' name, image, and likeness (NIL).

Q: In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court held that employers who do not act promptly to invoke an arbitration clause may be held to waive arbitration. What does this mean for my company?

A: As noted in our colleagues’ blog post, on May 23, in a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court held that employers who do not act promptly to invoke an arbitration clause may be held to waive arbitration. In so holding, the Court resolved a circuit court split over whether a party arguing waiver had to demonstrate prejudice. The Court held that prejudice was not a requirement. The Court’s holding departs from its generally pro-arbitration holdings over the last 15 years.